Hollow_Ninja
Member
GameKyuubi said:
You don't need a system to appreciate the games for it. I own a retail copy of Wipeout HD, but I don't own a PS3.
...What? It's nice to know that you have money to blow on random -your mother is a classy lady-, but some of us actually have to learn how to spend wisely.
Eelcire
Member
Hollow_Ninja said:
...What? It's nice to know that you have money to blow on random -your mother is a classy lady-, but some of us actually have to learn how to spend wisely.
Some of us have friends/family that own different systems than my own. I own 4 PS3 games and 4 Wii games, yet do not own either system. Wouldn't not spending money on a whole new system for so few games be considered 'spending wisely'? ;)
Hope Aksys is paying attention to these boards (and a certain Warning podcast) and taking these games into consideration!
GameKyuubi
Member
Hollow_Ninja said:
...What? It's nice to know that you have money to blow on random -your mother is a classy lady-, but some of us actually have to learn how to spend wisely.
Random -your mother is a classy lady-? It's a :
- Game
- On PS3
- Worth owning
That doesn't happen too often.
GameKyuubi
Member
Regarding MBAACC:
MissedFRC said:
First of all, he thanks all the players, fans and Tougeki organizers for allowing MB to be present at Tougeki this year, and that he would like to see the game be featured in the tourney again next year. He also thanks people for coming to see them at AOU.He then goes into explain the old blog post about the challenge of porting the game to PC/PS3:
* 'PC and PS3' were simply mentioned because that's what people requested the most through tweets. They are thinking about the Xbox 360 as well.
* 'Political hurdles' previously mentioned include factors such as
1. Cost evaluation, which at this point it seems impractical for them to try to make a game for the current-gen consoles.
2. Licensing by TYPE-MOON.
3. Technical challenges for them in making a port for the current-gen consoles.
4. The difficulty of 'sprite graphics behind its time' (he said that in his own words) to gain approval from SCE.
* As of now, there is no plan to port the game to the PS3, and it will likely be out of question for a while.However, he also notes that something is currently being planned for the RING (arcade) version of MBAACC.
SCE strikes again. Melty is too ugly for Sony.
Aksys can't localize a port that doesn't exist yet, people.
Hollow_Ninja
Member
GameKyuubi said:
Regarding MBAACC:SCE strikes again. Melty is too ugly for Sony.
Aksys can't localize a port that doesn't exist yet, people.
Oh, and I should also probably mention: if Melty Blood is too ugly for Sony, then logic would have it that Arcana Heart 3 would get rejected by Sony too, because it has sub-HD graphics.
OH WAI-
MidnightRed
Member
Hollow_Ninja said:
Oh, and I should also probably mention: if Melty Blood is too ugly for Sony, then logic would have it that Arcana Heart 3 would get rejected by Sony too, because it has sub-HD graphics.OH WAI-
I guess the PSN download would be ideal for Arcana Heart 3 when it's being localized here, like Aksys did with Battle Fantasia and Record of Agarest War.
GameKyuubi
Member
Hollow_Ninja said:
There are plenty of PS3 games worth owning, unless you're living back in 2006.
Only a select few I can't get on 360. :/ Most big-budget fighters are on both consoles, the majority of the less-well funded ones are on 360, and most shmups are also 360 only.
Hollow_Ninja said:
Oh, and I should also probably mention: if Melty Blood is too ugly for Sony, then logic would have it that Arcana Heart 3 would get rejected by Sony too, because it has sub-HD graphics.OH WAI-
AH3 looks pretty good for not being made by Arcsys. The Melty sprites, on the other hand, definitely need some work to be comparable. There is a SIGNIFICANT difference between the two.
Letters
Member
Hollow_Ninja said:
Oh, and I should also probably mention: if Melty Blood is too ugly for Sony, then logic would have it that Arcana Heart 3 would get rejected by Sony too, because it has sub-HD graphics.OH WAI-
Melty Blood actually has much lower resolution sprites than Arcana Heart, but in my opinion MB is better animated.
Also Arcana Heart is technically a high definition game now, everything except the characters are drawn/run at high resolutions. The resolution of the character sprites are somewhere in between Blazblue and Guilty Gear.
Gaming King
Member
Those are all fine and lolilicious games that Aksys should probably do to cement itself as Master of Lolis and Adorabulz, but only Arcana Heart is on a system I have as of right now.
Hollow_Ninja
Member
Letters said:
Melty Blood actually has much lower resolution sprites than Arcana Heart, but in my opinion MB is better animated.
Also Arcana Heart is technically a high definition game now, everything except the characters are drawn/run at high resolutions. The resolution of the character sprites are somewhere in between Blazblue and Guilty Gear.
Well, Record of Agarest War had much lower quality sprites than any of those, and it got released...
I agree with you on the Melty Blood animation though. The resolution may be low, but the animation is so good that it makes up for it.
You must log in to post.
